Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 14:51

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ananda Lewis’ sister reveals former MTV VJ’s dying wish - New York Post
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Disney to pay almost $439 million to take full control of streaming service Hulu - AP News
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
'Mission: Impossible 8': Inside How They Shot Underwater Submarine - IndieWire
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
What is the recipe for making a turmeric and ginger drink?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
To Break a Bad Habit and Create a New One, Neuroscience Says Just Make One Simple Change - Inc.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ford Stock Rises After Strong May Sales. The Pain Is Coming. - Barron's
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Over a million people now have access to the gen-AI powered Alexa+ - TechCrunch